Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D079F99D8 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:55:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57308-10 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:55:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75029F96B6 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:55:09 -0400 (AST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id lABEt5J23840; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:55:05 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200711111455.lABEt5J23840@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation In-Reply-To: <200711110442.lAB4gB824197@momjian.us> To: Bruce Momjian Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:55:05 -0500 (EST) CC: Tom Lane , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/30 X-Sequence-Number: 4563 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > I am still desperately unhappy with the choice to put the contrib docs > > where they were put. They are by no stretch of the imagination part of > > the "SQL Language", and there is no defense for having inserted them > > into the middle of the part, in front of substantially more widely > > interesting information such as concurrency control. > > I think we need to decide where they will go; they are easy to move. > > > Furthermore, labeling them "Standard Modules" is somebody's flight of > > wishful thinking --- if they were installed by default, they'd deserve > > such a title, but that's not happening any time soon. > > That name needs adjustment too. How about "Additional Supplied Modules"? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +