Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6D72E157F for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:56:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62858-07 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:56:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail43.e.nsc.no (mail43.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.43]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E7B2E156A for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:56:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.57] (062016190089.customer.alfanett.no [62.16.190.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail43.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id lADFtx1W026455 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:55:59 +0100 (MET) From: "Leif B. Kristensen" To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Avoiding upgrade backlash User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200711121442.31233.josh@agliodbs.com> In-Reply-To: <200711121442.31233.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Face: %iea8o"[SI'kMDS.`hz7lU=?\^lC9J-]CVjo; f{4-C:$?uVUEjyN~uYFn%*aH_c3d09U>=?iso-8859-1?q?x=0A=09TXtaoj=7EMV=2E8PgG7hik9=3BcCT2N6+u?=@Y{wH\p3*_f~FH9k,Wi74e[_l%.7b^'zJ)8S'^G<(=?iso-8859-1?q?=3D=0A=09zw8=5CPMC3=27=7BKl9=2EzL*ks!b6wA?=,c~'F`k&Vq|ELDGa|4 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/66 X-Sequence-Number: 12883 On Monday 12. November 2007, Josh Berkus wrote: >I'm thinking that we need to warn everyone about: >1) They need to use 8.3's pg_dump, not the old version, to upgrade Isn't there a chicken-and-egg problem here? On my Gentoo system, I have always been forced to uninstall the old version before upgrading to a new version. In practice, that means that I have to do a full dump of the databases with the current pg_dump, delete or rename the data directory, and then restore after the upgrade. I'd like to see a detailed howto on this ... -- Leif Biberg Kristensen | Registered Linux User #338009 http://solumslekt.org/ | Cruising with Gentoo/KDE My Jazz Jukebox: http://www.last.fm/user/leifbk/