Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A632E2D47 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:40:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04683-02 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:40:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DA62E2D42 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:40:24 -0400 (AST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id lAE3eOJ20499; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:40:24 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200711140340.lAE3eOJ20499@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation In-Reply-To: <11780.1195005726@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:40:24 -0500 (EST) CC: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/50 X-Sequence-Number: 4583 Tom Lane wrote: > Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a > good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ. I have updated the FAQ and FAQ_DEV. > There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml, > which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically > correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore. > Thoughts? Uh, if we can update them I think we should. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +