Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DEF2E2002 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:08:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45290-10 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:08:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D5E2E072B for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:08:35 -0400 (AST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id lAEE8Xj19398; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:08:33 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200711141408.lAEE8Xj19398@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation In-Reply-To: <11780.1195005726@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:08:33 -0500 (EST) CC: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/53 X-Sequence-Number: 4586 Tom Lane wrote: > Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a > good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ. > > There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml, > which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically > correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore. > Thoughts? I looked at the release note mention of gborg and they are generic URLs meaning they don't point to specific projects, I think we should just leave them alone (as Marc suggested). -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +