Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362682E2D46 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:15:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67986-08 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:15:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from flame.co.za (ns.flame.co.za [160.124.170.1]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3572E28BA for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:15:09 -0400 (AST) Received: by flame.co.za (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E18A8039A; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:15:03 +0200 (SAST) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:15:03 +0200 To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Avoiding upgrade backlash Message-ID: <20071118091503.GA2475@flame.co.za> References: <473F568D.2060308@commandprompt.com> <200711172105.lAHL5oV02191@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711172105.lAHL5oV02191@momjian.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: theo@flame.co.za (Theo Kramer) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=BAYES_50=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200711/71 X-Sequence-Number: 4604 On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 04:05:50PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > What I have done is to move the item up to the top of our > incompatibilities list in the release notes. That is near zero cost for > everyone. It bit me when testing my code against PG 8.3. Your docs helped me see my mistake immediately. Thanks and Regards Theo