Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB102E00F7;
	Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:52:19 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 23266-07; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:52:17 -0400 (AST)
Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E582E00B7;
	Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:52:17 -0400 (AST)
Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and
	authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
	5C41EDCCD32; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:52:16 +0100 (CET)
From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net>
To: josh@agliodbs.com
CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Message-ID: <200712130750460000@854623032>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:50:45 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200712/47
X-Sequence-Number: 4715

> Just FYI, it's going to be difficult to replace the name of the feature in 
> the PR docs at this point; I already have 11 translations.  What's *wrong* 
> with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it 
> for 6 months?
> 

Are you saying the PR was 'string freezed' before rc1? And before the actual backend? I wonder how reasonable that really is...

That said we shouldn't change things around for no reason. IKn this case I think there was good motivation.

/Magnus