Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84752E0218 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:02:58 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69562-07 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:02:37 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7D72E00EC for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:02:45 -0400 (AST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id m25F2fm03349; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:02:41 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200803051502.m25F2fm03349@momjian.us> Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres In-Reply-To: <47CEB516.7090007@archonet.com> To: Richard Huxton Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:02:41 -0500 (EST) CC: David Fetter , PostgreSQL Docs X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/5 X-Sequence-Number: 4817 Richard Huxton wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > David Fetter wrote: > >> If you really need to embed an > >> SQL engine in a binary, consider the excellent > >> SQLite > > or Firebird > > >> for the purpose. > > Just to be fair. sqlite seems much more appropriate for embedding. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +