Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6182E02E3 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:09:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87829-03 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:09:34 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70F52E0218 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:09:42 -0400 (AST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id m25F9cs11343; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:09:38 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200803051509.m25F9cs11343@momjian.us> Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres In-Reply-To: <47CEB6BA.8020503@archonet.com> To: Richard Huxton Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:09:38 -0500 (EST) CC: David Fetter , PostgreSQL Docs X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/8 X-Sequence-Number: 4820 Richard Huxton wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Richard Huxton wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> David Fetter wrote: > >>>> If you really need to embed an > >>>> SQL engine in a binary, consider the excellent > >>>> SQLite > >> or Firebird > >> > >>>> for the purpose. > >> Just to be fair. > > > > sqlite seems much more appropriate for embedding. > > It's certainly the lightest DB I'm aware of, but Firebird does have an > embedded mode (apparentl - I tend to use a different DB :-) Right. The issue with Firebird is it does both embedded and traditional, while sqlite is only embedded, so is probably a better choice for that purpose. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +