Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E3D2E30CB for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:24:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58607-01-7 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:24:02 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1E42E305F for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:22:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (190-95-27-98.bk17-dsl.surnet.cl [190.95.27.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BHMFYl027760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:23:00 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 947C447BFC; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:21:47 -0300 (CLST) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:21:47 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Scott Marlowe Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: order of entries in admin docs Message-ID: <20080311172147.GU9116@alvh.no-ip.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:23:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/37 X-Sequence-Number: 4849 Scott Marlowe escribió: > Seems that Client Authentication should come right after Server > Configuration. After all, how is someone going to handle roles and > database creation before they've authenticated? Is there some reason > for the order that I'm missing? Is it an easy change? I'd be happy > to try and make a patch for something like that if there's a chance of > it getting through / my figuring out how to do it in the docs. Yeah, see postgres.sgml -- changing the order is just a matter of moving where the entries appear. The current order is probably just historical. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support