public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Update to FAQ
6+ messages / 4 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Update to FAQ
@ 2005-11-22 18:28 Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2005-11-22 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

I have update the first section of the FAQ:

	http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ.html

In particular:

	o  reordered items to be more logical
	o  added clarification of license
	o  added section about bug reporting replies
	o  added section of feature requests

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [email protected]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Update to FAQ
@ 2008-04-09 00:18 Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
  2008-04-09 00:35 ` Re: Update to FAQ Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread

From: Joshua D. Drake @ 2008-04-09 00:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

To address naming issue.


-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




Attachments:

  [text/x-patch] faq.diff (1.3K, 2-faq.diff)
  download | inline diff:
Index: FAQ
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/FAQ,v
retrieving revision 1.452
diff -c -r1.452 FAQ
*** FAQ	3 Mar 2008 16:22:55 -0000	1.452
--- FAQ	9 Apr 2008 00:13:38 -0000
***************
*** 105,114 ****
     company. To get involved, see the developer's FAQ at
     http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html
     
!    Postgres is a widely-used nickname for PostgreSQL. It was the original
!    name of the project at Berkeley and is strongly preferred over other
!    nicknames. If you find 'PostgreSQL' hard to pronounce, call it
!    'Postgres' instead.
     
    1.2) Who controls PostgreSQL?
    
--- 105,118 ----
     company. To get involved, see the developer's FAQ at
     http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html
     
!    In November 2007 a classic Open Source debate took place on whether
!    or not to change the name of the PostgreSQL project to Postgres.
!    It was decided that Postgres would be an officially recognized 
!    nickname but that the name would remain PostgreSQL. Postgres was 
!    the original name of the project at Berkeley and is strongly 
!    preferred over other nicknames. If you find 'PostgreSQL' hard 
!    to pronounce, call it 'Postgres' instead.
!    
     
    1.2) Who controls PostgreSQL?
    


^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Update to FAQ
  2008-04-09 00:18 Update to FAQ Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
@ 2008-04-09 00:35 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  2008-04-09 00:42   ` Re: Update to FAQ Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2008-04-09 00:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs


I don't see the value in referencing a community discussion in the FAQ. 
What is the goal for this change?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> To address naming issue.
> 
> 
> -- 
> The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
> PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
> United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> 
> 

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Update to FAQ
  2008-04-09 00:18 Update to FAQ Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
  2008-04-09 00:35 ` Re: Update to FAQ Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
@ 2008-04-09 00:42   ` Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  2008-04-09 00:46     ` Re: Update to FAQ Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  2008-04-09 00:52     ` Re: Update to FAQ Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Greg Sabino Mullane @ 2008-04-09 00:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


Joshua proposed:

!    In November 2007 a classic Open Source debate took place on whether
!    or not to change the name of the PostgreSQL project to Postgres.
!    It was decided that Postgres would be an officially recognized
!    nickname but that the name would remain PostgreSQL. Postgres was
!    the original name of the project at Berkeley and is strongly
!    preferred over other nicknames. If you find 'PostgreSQL' hard
!    to pronounce, call it 'Postgres' instead.
!

The debate has certainly spread well before (and after) November 2007.
Not sure what makes it a "classic Open Source debate" either. Because
it was debated in the open? I think the "decision" was basically
Core's punting of making the tough but necessary decision to make
the project name pronounceable once again (if I can add some spin
of my own :). If we are going to say "It was decided", we need
to state who (Core) actually did the decreeing / deciding.

In case it wasn't clear, I'm not in support of changing the FAQ
as proposed above.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected]
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200804082039
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkf8ELYACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjOdACgn6htAFGYQsM70I3TDkQhM+Nh
pFsAn2fyWe7lNIcHkBnVMcMIBL1xDM7G
=Nxri
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Update to FAQ
  2008-04-09 00:18 Update to FAQ Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
  2008-04-09 00:35 ` Re: Update to FAQ Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  2008-04-09 00:42   ` Re: Update to FAQ Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
@ 2008-04-09 00:46     ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2008-04-09 00:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
> 
> 
> Joshua proposed:
> 
> !    In November 2007 a classic Open Source debate took place on whether
> !    or not to change the name of the PostgreSQL project to Postgres.
> !    It was decided that Postgres would be an officially recognized
> !    nickname but that the name would remain PostgreSQL. Postgres was
> !    the original name of the project at Berkeley and is strongly
> !    preferred over other nicknames. If you find 'PostgreSQL' hard
> !    to pronounce, call it 'Postgres' instead.
> !
> 
> The debate has certainly spread well before (and after) November 2007.
> Not sure what makes it a "classic Open Source debate" either. Because
> it was debated in the open? I think the "decision" was basically
> Core's punting of making the tough but necessary decision to make
> the project name pronounceable once again (if I can add some spin
> of my own :). If we are going to say "It was decided", we need
> to state who (Core) actually did the decreeing / deciding.
> 
> In case it wasn't clear, I'm not in support of changing the FAQ
> as proposed above.

In looking at it now I see the Berkeley sentence isn't necessary so I
just remove it.  (It was copied from the documentation.)  New text:

    <P>Postgres is a widely-used nickname for PostgreSQL.  If you find
    'PostgreSQL' hard to pronounce, call it 'Postgres' instead.</P>

Shorter is better in the FAQ.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Update to FAQ
  2008-04-09 00:18 Update to FAQ Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
  2008-04-09 00:35 ` Re: Update to FAQ Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  2008-04-09 00:42   ` Re: Update to FAQ Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
@ 2008-04-09 00:52     ` Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Joshua D. Drake @ 2008-04-09 00:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

On Wed,  9 Apr 2008 00:42:07 -0000
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[email protected]> wrote:


> !    In November 2007 a classic Open Source debate took place on
> whether !    or not to change the name of the PostgreSQL project to
> Postgres. !    It was decided that Postgres would be an officially
> recognized !    nickname but that the name would remain PostgreSQL.
> Postgres was !    the original name of the project at Berkeley and is
> strongly !    preferred over other nicknames. If you find
> 'PostgreSQL' hard !    to pronounce, call it 'Postgres' instead.
> !
> 
> The debate has certainly spread well before (and after) November 2007.

The "decision" came down from core in 11/2007 which is why I referenced
it.

> Not sure what makes it a "classic Open Source debate" either.

Long winded, full of flames and pointless :P

> Because
> it was debated in the open? I think the "decision" was basically
> Core's punting of making the tough but necessary decision to make
> the project name pronounceable once again (if I can add some spin
> of my own :). If we are going to say "It was decided", we need
> to state who (Core) actually did the decreeing / deciding.

Dave Page:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2007-11/msg00109.php

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-09 00:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-22 18:28 Update to FAQ Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2008-04-09 00:18 Update to FAQ Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2008-04-09 00:35 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2008-04-09 00:42   ` Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2008-04-09 00:46     ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2008-04-09 00:52     ` Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox