Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3933E2E0049; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:51:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36162-04; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:51:37 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3012E003D; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:51:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3AEpgjL028587 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:51:43 -0700 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:51:09 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" To: Tom Lane Cc: Alvaro Herrera , Martin Edlman , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, Pg Hackers , Pg Docs , andrew@dunslane.net Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW Message-ID: <20080410075109.069e1e9a@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <1413.1207838725@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <47FA034B.7090201@fortech.cz> <162867790804070511y7266c911w370db97a78c3c519@mail.gmail.com> <47FB51C7.6090509@fortech.cz> <20080408132157.GF5290@alvh.no-ip.org> <47FDFB2E.3060503@fortech.cz> <20080410131602.GF4697@alvh.no-ip.org> <1413.1207838725@sss.pgh.pa.us> Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:51:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/11 X-Sequence-Number: 4871 On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:25 -0400 Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > Question for plperl hackers: Should we remove the mention of > > DBD::PgSPI from the PL/Perl manual? >=20 > It seems like a reasonable suggestion to me, since perl database users > probably already know DBD and don't have to learn something new if > they go that way. >=20 > Possibly the text should be reworded, with the mention of DBD::PgSPI > put somewhere else or stuck into a or something. =46rom what I can see on CPAN (unless I am missing something) DBD::PgSPI hasn't been updated since 2004 and is at version 0.2. http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/DBD/ I think it can safely be removed in entirety from our manuals. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake --=20 The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/=20 PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate