Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4012E002C for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:49:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66646-05 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:49:37 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from gauss.credativ.com (gauss.credativ.com [212.112.227.254]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060012E0069 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:49:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hawking.credativ.lan (exit.credativ.com [87.139.82.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gauss.credativ.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA11B77550 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:49:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: xmlagg documentation Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:49:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806161149.39595.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200806/9 X-Sequence-Number: 4926 I just noticed that the xmlagg function is not documented. (Here is a random piece of documentation for those who are not familiar with what it does: http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/fn_XMLAGG.html) I'm wondering whether we should put this with the aggregate functions or the XML functions, or both, in some way. Any ideas?