Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CB7632FED
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:17:17 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 03937-05 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:17:13 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA31632FE0
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:17:13 -0400 (AST)
Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
 n1C3HCO16080;
	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:17:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <200902120317.n1C3HCO16080@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Clarification to catalog-pg-class
In-Reply-To: <49929912.9070803@gmx.net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:17:12 -0500 (EST)
CC: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200902/9
X-Sequence-Number: 5055

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Bruce,
> >>
> >>>> Currently, catalog-pg-class is a bit confusing as to where FKs are 
> >>>> tracked in pg_class.  Please update the lines for relchecks and 
> >>>> reltriggers to read:
> >>>>
> >>>> relchecks	int2	 	 Number of check constraints on the table (but not 
> >>>> other types of constraints); see pg_constraint catalog
> >>> Uh, why do we have to say "but" when we clearly say "check constraints"?
> >>> Do we need to say "CHECK" contraints?
> >> Because I've encountered two people on IRC (and a client) who were 
> >> confused about this, and it confused me briefly when I fielded their 
> >> questions.  Saying "CHECK constraints" would also probably do it, or 
> >> saying "check constraints (only)"
> > 
> > Uppercase done, with <literal> tag.
> 
> This is inconsistent with the rest of the documentation.

Should I use <emphasis>?  <literal>?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +