Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD338634B55 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:53:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29489-06 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:53:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mx3.hub.org (mx3.hub.org [206.223.169.73]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D57A634784 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:47:56 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by mx3.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E341F37B4D0 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:47:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (200-126-96-54.bk7-dsl.surnet.cl [200.126.96.54]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2UFsSqg008720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:54:31 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B87FF70A5; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:47:30 -0400 (CLT) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:47:30 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Mario Splivalo Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index Message-ID: <20090330154730.GC23023@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <49CF8FCD.10006@megafon.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49CF8FCD.10006@megafon.hr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:54:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.011 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/24 X-Sequence-Number: 5082 Mario Splivalo wrote: > None of the array functions > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) > are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? > I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. Agreed -- please submit a patch. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support