public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: David Fetter <[email protected]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:54:12 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:50:13PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote:
> > While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the
> > "advanced" section?  They've been standard for many years.  Heck,
> > even MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for
> > many years.
> 
> Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have
> to mean basic.

Are you seriously arguing that foreign keys aren't basic?  Seriously?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: [email protected]

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox