Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7EA634080 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:50:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74898-07 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:50:46 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AF38633CE3 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:50:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2009 18:50:32 -0000 Received: from a91-154-107-53.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO vanquo.pezone.net) [91.154.107.53] by mail.gmx.net (mp070) with SMTP; 27 Apr 2009 20:50:32 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19pFWMhtzJp2dFoXAPCN9Ya5TZfPgzpSr94seR8H5 d7jJ1eYt7krPU0 From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:50:13 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.26-2-686; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) Cc: David Fetter , Bruce Momjian References: <20090427162736.9DEF575407D@cvs.postgresql.org> <20090427171027.GL1539@fetter.org> In-Reply-To: <20090427171027.GL1539@fetter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904272150.14482.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.7 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.183 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.183 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200904/64 X-Sequence-Number: 5152 On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote: > While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the > "advanced" section? They've been standard for many years. Heck, even > MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for many years. Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have to mean basic.