Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96987635216 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 18:45:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20455-09 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 21:45:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE95635237 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 18:45:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id o4QLjFF24049; Wed, 26 May 2010 17:45:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <201005262145.o4QLjFF24049@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Londiste In-Reply-To: To: Robert Haas Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:45:15 -0400 (EDT) CC: Francisco Reyes , Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.011 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_20=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201005/45 X-Sequence-Number: 5542 Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Francisco Reyes wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian writes: > >> > >> > Well, I assumed "Londiste" head reached the level that we should mention > >> > it, but you are right on the floodgates issue. ?We do aleady mention > >> > many other replication solutions in other sections, so I didn't think > >> > >> Then perhaps all that is needed is to just link to the replication section > >> of the wiki: > >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pool > >> ing > >> > >> A search for replication on the top of the doc page (ie > >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/index.html) takes to the high > >> availability page, so a reference there to the wiki page may be a good idea. > > > > That is an excellent idea, not only for replication, but there are > > probably other wiki pages that we should link to from our main docs. ?I > > will go through the wiki, find appropriate pages, and add links from our > > docs. > > I don't know that I'm eager to link from our docs to the wiki. That > seems likely to lead to maintenance headaches. But on the other hand, > I see no problem mentioning third-party products that are part of the > PG ecosystem. Well, the problem is that we have more solutions that fit in the docs in normal places. I was thinking of just linking to major wiki pages, like replication and pooling. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com