Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657DA6323FF for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:33:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35761-03 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail48.e.nsc.no (mail48.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.48]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA49632308 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:33:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from balapapa.localnet (42.185.16.62.customer.cdi.no [62.16.185.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail48.nsc.no (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5AFXItS022379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:33:18 +0200 (MEST) From: Leif Biberg Kristensen To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Cognitive dissonance Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:33:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo-r7; KDE/4.3.5; i686; ; ) References: <29FD1BB6-9AD8-485C-B5D2-23D66C15DC97@numericable.fr> <1276182912-sup-2656@alvh.no-ip.org> <16964.1276183440@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <16964.1276183440@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006101733.18062.leif@solumslekt.org> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_50=0.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201006/448 X-Sequence-Number: 163985 On Thursday 10. June 2010 17.24.00 Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue jun 10 02:50:14 -0400 2010: > >> As I said back then, doing this is straightforward, but we kind of need > >> more than one user who asks for it before we make it part of a regular > >> service, which comes with maintenance costs. > > > Hey, count me as another interested person in a single-file plain-text > > doc output format. > > Well, there are two separate things here: > > * providing a Makefile target to build plain-text output. > > * shipping prebuilt plain text docs in standard distributions. > > I am for #1, not so much for #2, mainly on the grounds of size. But > given #1 it would be possible for packagers to make their own choices > about whether to include plain-text docs. Wouldn't it suffice to make it downloadable, like the pdf doc? regards, -- Leif Biberg Kristensen http://solumslekt.org/blog/