Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D5F632C5D; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:47:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86538-10; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:47:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF655633309; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:47:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id o7C1lBO18813; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:47:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <201008120147.o7C1lBO18813@momjian.us> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement In-Reply-To: <4C51AAFA.7090601@gmail.com> To: Satoshi Nagayasu Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:47:11 -0400 (EDT) CC: Tom Lane , Robert Haas , Michael Meskes , Lars Nordin , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/24 X-Sequence-Number: 5848 Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > On 2010/07/29 17:41, Michael Meskes wrote: > > I had a short look at the docs Satoshi-san put online and yes, I'm impressed. > > However, I won't be able to proof read them before September. But given that > > 9.1 development is just starting I see no problem in putting the docs into the > > archive be it cvs or git and improve if there if it really needs improvement. > > In my short check I didn't see anything major that needed to be changed. This > > of course implies that the new docs are available in a suitable format. > > Thank you all for your attention to the ecpg document work. > > Yes, I see some developers are too busy, so it's difficult to take time > to review such large amount of changes of the doc for now. > > I'm thinking about taking a few weeks after August or September > to review and merge the document intensively (like CommitFest) > by some developers who are interested in this doc. > > I know this change is very huge, and it's very difficult to review > and give feedback through the whole document. So I think we sould take > an approach to review and merge chapter by chapter during the period, > and it can be an effective way to merge this large change > if we can take time for such intensive work. > > Is this possible? Any suggestions? I would like to help too. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +