Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA656346AE for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:47:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75020-02 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:47:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CA0634743 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:47:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id o8CDlSO07694; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:47:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <201009121347.o8CDlSO07694@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Missing Win32 archive_command example In-Reply-To: To: Robert Haas Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:47:28 -0400 (EDT) CC: PostgreSQL-documentation X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/66 X-Sequence-Number: 6056 Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I noticed that there is no Win32 example for archive_command in our 9.0 > > docs in the PITR setup docs: > > > > ? ? ? ?http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL > > > > and no examples at all in the archive_command config section. ?We only > > show Win32 recovery syntax examples for recovery.conf: > > > > ? ? ? ?http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/archive-recovery-settings.html > > > > A Win32 example did exist in our 8.4 docs for the archive_command definition: > > > > ? ? ? ?http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/runtime-config-wal.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-WAL-ARCHIVING > > > > Seems there should be a Windows example right next to the Unix > > archive_command example we have now. > > I think that you are right. Done and backpatched. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +