Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C322F632E2D for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:33:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57684-03 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:33:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8F46329B6 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:32:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id o8DLWWj04402; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:32:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <201009132132.o8DLWWj04402@momjian.us> Subject: Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements In-Reply-To: <4C8E2454020000250003560D@gw.wicourts.gov> To: Kevin Grittner Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:32:32 -0400 (EDT) CC: Peter Eisentraut , Thom Brown , Magnus Hagander , PostgreSQL www , Tom Lane X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.909 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, WEIRD_PORT=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/85 X-Sequence-Number: 19172 Kevin Grittner wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > There are just too many things going on. Reduce the number of > > colors, reduce the number of different border designs (round, not > > round), make the borders less busy (remove the line), remove the > > shadows, reduce the number of different levels of indentation. > > Personally, I would be disappointed if we backed off from these > changes much. The current docs look like something I would have > seen coming off the bidirectional print-head of a Teletype(R) > machine a few decades ago. I've gone back and forth between that Agreed. > and Thom's latest draft trying to pick out useful information on > various pages, and for me the visual cues help considerably in > finding what I want. On top of that, switching to the new look is a > refreshing experience each time; when I switch back to our current > docs, I can actually feel my eyes tighten up as they prepare to pick > out content from a mass of uniform text. > > I know people process visual information differently, but I really > have a hard time seeing anything offensive about where Thom has > taken it, and that was based on a lot of feedback from several > different people. Agreed. FYI, everyone should be looking at the same version: http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/8.4/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html If we make these changes, there is nothing in stone preventing us from tweaking it later, but I think there is general agreement that the new format is an improvement. We have to accept we will never make everyone happy. The only constructive suggestion I can make to perhaps make more people happy would be to go with only vertical lines to highlight the code blocks, e.g. instead of: +-------------+ | text | +-------------+ we do | text | but I am not sure if I even would prefer that. FYI, I would like to see this rolled into our production web server in the next few days so it is ready for the 9.0 release. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +