Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D549A1337B67 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:17:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89246-01 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 23:17:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B7B1337999 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:17:29 -0400 (AST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id p12NHU202016; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:17:30 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <201102022317.p12NHU202016@momjian.us> Subject: Re: varname for GUC variables In-Reply-To: <4655.1296688499@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:17:30 -0500 (EST) CC: PostgreSQL-documentation X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201102/9 X-Sequence-Number: 6357 Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I have applied the attached patch to use SGML markup > > consistently for GUC variables. Should we be using to link to > > more GUC details in the docs? > > For the most part I think we do have enough links. In particular I do > *not* want to see multiple references to the same variable in the same > paragraph all turned into links; that's just distracting. True on the multiple instances in a paragraph. I will drop it unless someone feels we need more. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +