Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FC21337BC8 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:54:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06625-03-3 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:54:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1EF1337B96 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:54:29 -0400 (AST) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id p13GsTo09143; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:54:29 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <201102031654.p13GsTo09143@momjian.us> Subject: Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"? In-Reply-To: <4D4A5B29.1010606@gmail.com> To: Satoshi Nagayasu Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:54:29 -0500 (EST) CC: PostgreSQL-documentation X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201102/15 X-Sequence-Number: 6363 Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > Hi all, > > I just found "PL" is explained as "Programming Languages" > in the Acronyms section. > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/acronyms.html > > I think this should be "Procedural Languages" because > "Procedural" is used in the Server Programming section. > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/server-programming.html > > I've created a patch, but which should we use? "Procedural Languages" is correct. Patch applied. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +