Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D126A1336971
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  7 Feb 2011 11:55:07 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 89023-09 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  7 Feb 2011 15:55:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6931337B54
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Mon,  7 Feb 2011 11:55:00 -0400 (AST)
Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
 p17Fswe20719;
	Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:54:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <201102071554.p17Fswe20719@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: remove tags.
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim7FZvuqRB7r7yxcxFKgD0F241ue6o6BcxRUoX-@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:54:58 -0500 (EST)
CC: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201102/32
X-Sequence-Number: 6380

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> >>> remove tags.
> >> >
> >> >> Sorry, vague commit message (I forgot squash).
> >> >
> >> >> Can I will use git ammend to improve this message?
> >>
> >> Absolutely not.
> >>
> >> > How about git revert, instead? ?It's not apparent to me that these
> >> > changes were improvements.
> >>
> >> I'll buy that one.
> >
> > [ ?CC to docs, committers removed. ]
> >
> > Well, if we want to revert, then we have to add <literal> to all the
> > numbers used in our docs --- there was no logic in what we previously
> > had. ?Do we want that?
> >
> > Here is an example line I did not change:
> >
> > ? an otherwise idle connection. ?A value of 0 uses the system default.
> >
> > Do we want that 0 to appear in a fixed-width font via <literal>?
> > It is easy to do but we should decide.
> 
> [ removing -hackers from CC also, no need to cross-post ]
> 
> Hmm.  I'm starting to lean toward leaving this as you have it.
> 
> Which way did we more commonly do it before you applied this patch?

It was mostly like the line I have above, meaning it was not in
fixed-width font, 95% I would say.  I modified 19 to be like the rest. 
I left <literal> where the context made sense.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +