Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524681337B9C; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:11:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33156-02; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:11:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from fetter.org (mail.fetter.org [64.81.66.25]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7491337B5D; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:11:08 -0400 (AST) Received: by fetter.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id DAC93FBC89E; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:11:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:11:07 -0800 From: David Fetter To: Thom Brown Cc: Robert Haas , pgsql-docs , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sync rep doc corrections Message-ID: <20110307181107.GB12122@fetter.org> References: <20110307175106.GA12122@fetter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201103/21 X-Sequence-Number: 6454 On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:34:48PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote: > On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote: > >> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas wrote: > >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown wrote: > >> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown wrote: > >> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix > >> >>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info. > >> >> > >> >> Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also needed some fixes, > >> >> so those have been included in this new patch. > >> > > >> > I don't think it's necessary to cross-post these emails.... > >> > >> I've received conflicting information in the past on this, but I'm > >> assuming you're suggesting to send this just to the -docs list in > >> future? > > > > As I'm putting together the patches section for the PostgreSQL Weekly > > News, it helps me *enormously* to have only one list I need to check, > > so at least for me, it's an enormous help to have all patches at least > > CC'd, or better still, only posted, to -hackers. > > I cross-posted as it's a docs change, but I want to invite the > critical eye of those who dev'd it. Okay, so doc patches should go > exclusively to the -hackers list? Last time I recall some disparity > surrounding what I should be doing. "Should" is a word I won't get into on this subject. I was expressing and justifying a personal preference :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate