Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1A9B5DC01 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:44:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94449-06 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:44:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E575B5DC05 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:44:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id p5CLiN801167; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:44:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <201106122144.p5CLiN801167@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams In-Reply-To: To: Thom Brown Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:44:23 -0400 (EDT) CC: Rafael Martinez , Tom Lane , pgsql-docs X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201106/27 X-Sequence-Number: 6801 Thom Brown wrote: > On 27 September 2010 15:29, Thom Brown wrote: > > On 18 July 2010 11:58, Rafael Martinez wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Thom Brown wrote: > >> > >>> Okay, I just edited an existing dia file: pgclient_server.dia. ?All I > >>> did was change the font size of the text "client application" at the > >>> top of the diagram, and changed the properties of a line so the > >>> arrowhead was no longer on the end. ?I used dia 0.97.1 to edit the > >>> file. The result when saving is attached in the diff file. ?That's a > >>> lot of file changes for what I did. > >>> > >>> Thom > >>> > >> > >> Indeed. > >> > >> The only explanation I can find to this is that I used dia.0.96.1 to > >> generate the file and you have used 0.97.1 to edit it. > >> > >> Almost all changes are to the attributes: > >> ? >> ? >> > >> I suspect that these changes have been done because 'something' have > >> changed between the two main versions in the way they deal with these > >> attributes :( > > > > Has anyone yet come up with a reliable and sensible format we can use? > > Obviously nothing for this happened in time to make it for 9.1. So > are diagrams still something we plan to have? Agreed, we need to move forward with something, and I am afraid we got into bike-sheeting on this. Would someone please summarize the previous discussion so we can make some decisions and move forward? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +