From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <201109061640.p86Ges103842@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Migration page is out of date
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinOjGbjiAY3Hp2p11jwYSo1Y7VLXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:40:54 -0400 (EDT)
CC: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/migration.html
> >
> > This page:
> >
> > a) has insufficient coverage of pg_upgrade
> > b) ignores parallel pg_restore
> > c) piping pg_dump is by no means always the fastest method
> >
> > I'll write up a new version later, just wanted to put this note on the
> > ML so that somebody would bug me before the end of 9.1 beta.
> 
> Hey, you!

I am not sure if you were aware that I re-did the upgrade section of the
docs to clearly mention pg_upgrade and other issues:

	http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/upgrading.html

I am not sure how to mention parallel pg_restore when pg_dumpall can't
be used in parallel restore mode.

Any suggested changes?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +