public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedmake vs. gmake
3+ messages / 1 participants
[nested] [flat]
* make vs. gmake
@ 2013-07-26 17:49 Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2014-01-31 17:28 ` Re: make vs. gmake Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2013-07-26 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs
FYI, our source code build docs suggest 'gmake' in a number of places
while 'make' would be used on other platforms. Should we change these
to just say 'make'? I think we suggested 'gmake' in the past because of
FreeBSD having BSD 'make' and requring GNU make.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: make vs. gmake
2013-07-26 17:49 make vs. gmake Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
@ 2014-01-31 17:28 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2014-02-12 22:08 ` Re: make vs. gmake Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2014-01-31 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:49:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> FYI, our source code build docs suggest 'gmake' in a number of places
> while 'make' would be used on other platforms. Should we change these
> to just say 'make'? I think we suggested 'gmake' in the past because of
> FreeBSD having BSD 'make' and requiring GNU make.
FYI, I am going to change 'gmake' mentions in the docs to 'make', as I
think it meets the need of most of our users/developers.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: make vs. gmake
2013-07-26 17:49 make vs. gmake Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2014-01-31 17:28 ` Re: make vs. gmake Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
@ 2014-02-12 22:08 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2014-02-12 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:28:15PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:49:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > FYI, our source code build docs suggest 'gmake' in a number of places
> > while 'make' would be used on other platforms. Should we change these
> > to just say 'make'? I think we suggested 'gmake' in the past because of
> > FreeBSD having BSD 'make' and requiring GNU make.
>
> FYI, I am going to change 'gmake' mentions in the docs to 'make', as I
> think it meets the need of most of our users/developers.
Done.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-12 22:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-26 17:49 make vs. gmake Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2014-01-31 17:28 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2014-02-12 22:08 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox