Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqoNO-0004OG-C5 for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:19:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqoNN-0006SP-Kk for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:19:13 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqoNM-0006SG-8P for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:19:12 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqoNJ-00087y-NN for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:19:11 +0000 Received: from GK1C11 ([80.130.245.83]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDyil-1Vm6sd1gND-00HMT6 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:19:08 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:19:11 +0100 From: Wolfgang Keller To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) Message-Id: <20131211191911.856d8850f2e3bfc6e21eca4b@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <24304.1386704630@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <52A5EB31.7070505@nybeta.com> <9F208972-32D3-4295-A30D-BCDAEF139E9F@silentmedia.com> <20131210174738.a530d930b8fd1e972d84f234@gmx.net> <52A74907.8040400@hogranch.com> <20131210202425.4e54580731cba8190987d525@gmx.net> <24304.1386704630@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mail-Copies-To: never Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8pseZGodHqJHYA2fpYN0HBObUzZIb/kW3dBWvxEp22Ku6qL3ekX JmFCPXuH+t2DvkNgeZU6dy5087sw+vFCDq0FxdG+tr1+H31BZmd5D2CzkoyKE60xtUdlSJu lbyJXNZvs7QxEOF1wVD7a4fLhUTJo030fd/mT48i7MM14mSFPvwepDItd+OLLkas1csS4Sh KDbOsaYApsP+QUX+u/+Sw== X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org > >> postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork. > > > It would at least merit being mentioned in the doc, just like other > > "forks" or whatever you may call it, as long as they're open-source. > > You seem to not realize how many forks of Postgres there are. I had mentioned just one. And that one does not only fill in a functionality gap that is pretty important when it comes to competition/advocacy vs. e.g. that database with the capital "O", but it is also mentioned already on postgresql.org. Honestly, don't try to tell me that the majority of the developers working on PostgreSQL are not aware of PostgreSQL-XC. > There's no way that we can even track them all, let alone cater > for them in our documentation. Just putting one single URL into the doc instead of the misleading statement that there's no such thing should have been less work than replying to me. >;-> Disclaimer: I have nothing to do with PostgreSQL-XC, I don't even use it myself, I just happen to know that it exists, even though I am just a "casual" user of PostgreSQL. Sincerely, Wolfgang -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general