Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsDnq-00030W-1h for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:40:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsDno-0001jD-12 for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:40:20 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsDnm-0001ib-Az for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:40:18 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsDnj-0006F1-Mw for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:40:17 +0000 Received: from N07C01 ([46.253.55.117]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MaqeA-1W85xP2YzC-00KR42 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:40:14 +0100 Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:40:30 +0100 From: Wolfgang Keller To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) Message-Id: <20131215164030.ac9a35731511f435de886941@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <52A9E35C.3080203@commandprompt.com> References: <52A5EB31.7070505@nybeta.com> <9F208972-32D3-4295-A30D-BCDAEF139E9F@silentmedia.com> <20131210174738.a530d930b8fd1e972d84f234@gmx.net> <52A74907.8040400@hogranch.com> <20131210202425.4e54580731cba8190987d525@gmx.net> <24304.1386704630@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20131211191911.856d8850f2e3bfc6e21eca4b@gmx.net> <20131212171802.51bf444e2cb0cace64d7b256@gmx.net> <52A9E35C.3080203@commandprompt.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mail-Copies-To: never Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:sgPRRuXf4xKD16eYhp30jqKowv5ceihnEkObF5jzFbr7rHdve5L zP4RH+IwZKLawndkYReRCLlBQUCqd7i6qe/0CJiVq3QDKjkt4vneZOudAXhlyQ0qTbCIBCd axcM5wG7EKoFeMZ1+YlxXwvgwofKRDMXOtoIbbA5xBut8RmHXGTvcs4nhQm/JVzX6/xNq6b B+ZUNuVv6dbn4rHi3g/OQ== X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org > > Instead it lists Postgres-R, which has been in koma for how long > > now... Can't even remember any more. > > Nope, it is actively developed and sponsored by Translattice. "Actively developed"? http://www.postgres-r.org/ lists the last entry in the column "News" on the right with a date of 2010-07-14. http://git.postgres-r.org/ lists the "Last Change" to Postgres-R as "2 years ago". http://www.postgres-r.org/downloads/ lists the last "Snapshot patch" with a date from 2010-08-29. The "Postgres-R Live-CD" has a date from 2006-07-04! Sincerely, Wolfgang -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general