public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-docs <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:59:04 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRAyAOi9ZJbxMBPkW+r03n+zQm6idojWWH2n17h8NGyXBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFj8pRDHJqRwZd-GO1t3WnLnS--E943xPrEUSOT_nL8xr9mE2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAFj8pRDukaWkUtQRZujhbLRCh6haOY-FDunVXjf2X2XNdNOKGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAFj8pRAyAOi9ZJbxMBPkW+r03n+zQm6idojWWH2n17h8NGyXBA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 07:00:09AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>     Comment updated.  Patch attached.
> 
> 
> 
> Still I am missing message about preferred syntax (or we should to enhance GET
> DIAGNOSTICS doc about proprietary syntax).
> 
> PL/pgSQL, PL/SQL is mix of two languages: ADA and SQL - and their designers
> decided so embedded SQL statements will be placed in native SQL syntax (and ADA
> in simplified ADA syntax)
> 
> We have to find a agreement what we will prefer for PL/pgSQL:
> 
> The assign statement is "ADA" statement - ":=" is preferred
> 
> The GET DIAGNOSTICS is "SQL" statement - "=" is preferred
> 
> A newer SQL/PSM was designed differently - without this dichotomy - A
> assignment is emphased by syntax SET varname = value
>  
> A proper syntax is good information what is coming from - and It is good mental
> helper to understand a philosophy of stored procedures (that shares concepts
> with PL/SQL). Next argument is similarity with PL/SQL and SQL PL. This
> statement (GET DIAGNOSTICS) is supported on both environments and only "=" is
> allowed there.

I find the rules above so complex that I don't see how we can recommend
a best syntax.  What I did in the patch I just posted was to put the
preferred operator first, but I don't see why we want to get into these
details in the docs.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs



view thread (27+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox