Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3AUW-0007k9-Bx for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:21:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3AUV-0004Mt-M5 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:21:39 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3AUU-0004Ml-Lt for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:21:38 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3AUN-0005dY-Fq for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:21:37 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W3AUK-00030Z-SW; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:21:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:21:28 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Pavel Stehule Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc Message-ID: <20140114202128.GA7761@momjian.us> References: <24220.1389466350@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20140111190246.GG28089@momjian.us> <24577.1389467569@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20140112042306.GM28089@momjian.us> <20140113025904.GB22464@momjian.us> <20140113140433.GA7868@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:36:18PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Agreed.  I added a sentence in the first mention of GET DIAGNOSTICS, and > indicated it was generic for that command.  What I also added was your > description of when to use := and =, but I put it in the C comments so > we have a record of it and if we need to expand the description or > behavior later. > > > I'll be more happy if a comment about GET DIAGNOSTICS statement will be in user > space. I thought you would say that. :-) I don't see how this detail makes sense in the sections related to the syntax usage, so I looked in the section Porting from Oracle PL/SQL, and I don't see how it fits there either. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs