Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3ugH-0003XQ-2h for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:40:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3ugF-0003yk-K8 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:40:51 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3ug7-0003nj-Eb for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:40:43 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3ug3-0005vZ-Hv for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:40:42 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W3ug0-0005YW-FX; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:40:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:40:36 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Pavel Stehule Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc Message-ID: <20140116214036.GA15696@momjian.us> References: <20140113025904.GB22464@momjian.us> <20140113140433.GA7868@momjian.us> <20140114202128.GA7761@momjian.us> <20140115153535.GA7607@momjian.us> <20140115163259.GA12704@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20140115163259.GA12704@momjian.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:32:59AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 04:55:11PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > The problem is that these are philosophical issues that are not normally > > covered in our docs.  What I have done is to add a mention of which > > option is compliant to the new text.  Patch attached. > > > > Is GET DIAGNOSTICS defined in the standard for SQL/PSM only or for > > generic SQL? > > > > > > > > I found this statement in ANSI SQL 92 - and few minutes searching - it is in > > generic SQL - today "SQL framework" part and it is enhanced in "SQL/PSM" > > OK, patch updated. Patch applied. Yeah! -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs