public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Stark <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:02:51 -0300
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CA+TgmoZucoe-w5P_16A-gdfRBFCCu7PD17YO-KqrYPBhb5TxAA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAM-w4HNawF2sPDSUrZsng7zgGnste-Vy1+42AufyVq9UkVeCZw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAM3SWZRbVyijRX0vwhfap1S1o0OM1eGczJsQuL4CCrAs1++z7A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:20:42AM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> >> On 23/04/14 00:40, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?
>
> >>> FWIW, I still don't have any strong opinion here. I defer to others on
> >>> this question.
>
> >> I vote for changing it, even though neither option is ideal I think
> >> that given the nature of datatype the current default will break
> >> inserts for common usage pattern and that's much worse than not
> >> being able to use the index for some operators.
>
> > I agree. We should choose the most general option as the default.
>
> That seems to be the consensus, but now we need a name for the
> soon-to-be-not-default opclass. What's a good short adjective for it?
"comprehensive"? Not particularly short ...
According to Merriam Webster:
Synonyms
all-embracing, all-in [chiefly British], all-inclusive,
broad-gauge (or broad-gauged), compendious, complete,
encyclopedic, cover-all, cyclopedic, embracive, exhaustive,
full, global, inclusive, in-depth, omnibus, panoramic, thorough,
universal
Related Words
broad, catholic, encyclical, general, inclusionary, overall;
cosmic (also cosmical), extensive, far, far-reaching, grand,
large, panoptic, sweeping, vast, wide, wide-ranging; blanket,
indiscriminate, unrestricted
jsonb_omnibus_ops ?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
view thread (65+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox