Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Whlha-0000IX-HK for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 20:10:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WhlhZ-0001ao-Na for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 20:10:57 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WhlhY-0001ae-B0 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 20:10:56 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WhlhV-0007Zq-MX for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 20:10:55 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WhlhR-0004Xu-5B; Tue, 06 May 2014 16:10:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 16:10:49 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Tom Lane Cc: Greg Stark , Robert Haas , Heikki Linnakangas , Andrew Dunstan , Peter Geoghegan , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) Message-ID: <20140506201048.GI30817@momjian.us> References: <29030.1396993582@sss.pgh.pa.us> <534475B7.6020908@dunslane.net> <5344EAA4.1050605@vmware.com> <30137.1397057056@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20140422223230.GL10046@momjian.us> <16527.1398214220@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16527.1398214220@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:50:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change? > > Not sure. I'm for changing it, I think, but it wasn't at all clear > that we had consensus on that. We did not have a proposed new name > for the opclass either ... Where are we on this question? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers