Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKXv7-0005NL-Bz for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:21:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKXv6-0007k4-Bz for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:21:12 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKXv4-0007jv-9B for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:21:10 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XKXuz-0007kM-Qd for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:21:08 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XKXut-0002yq-Qz; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:20:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:20:59 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Josh Berkus Cc: Tom Lane , Magnus Hagander , Kevin Grittner , Peter Eisentraut , MauMau , "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Sample archive_command is still problematic Message-ID: <20140821192059.GA17771@momjian.us> References: <53F233E1.3030605@agliodbs.com> <5718.1408383072@sss.pgh.pa.us> <53F38726.2040804@agliodbs.com> <8453.1408469974@sss.pgh.pa.us> <53F39723.9070503@agliodbs.com> <20140820231242.GC17822@momjian.us> <53F63FD7.50407@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53F63FD7.50407@agliodbs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:52:07AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 08/20/2014 04:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:27:47AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> I'd also like to mention pg_receivexlog, Barman, WAL-E, and RepMgr as > >> external utilites and alternatives. > > > > Yes, please! We need to give users on what else is available, and the > > strengths of each. > > > > Well, I think putting an *evaluation* of the technologies there would be > problematic, because the docs change very slowly and outside tech > changes fast. I was just going to post "take a look at these examples". OK. I personally would like to know the strengths of each. Is that documented anywhere? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs