From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_config docs?
In-reply-to: <20190511214543.sacftzldtyzijjxm@momjian.us>
References: <20190511195148.ibcb2nmlhosvqhth@momjian.us>
 <10799.1557610043@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190511214501.37nvstrziyxomobh@momjian.us>
 <20190511214543.sacftzldtyzijjxm@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Sat, 11 May 2019 17:45:43 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <20143.1557611418.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 17:50:18 -0400
Message-ID: <20144.1557611418@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:45:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> We don't, because it's just the infrastructure under the pg_config view.

> Uh, I listed it under "Functions" in the release notes.  Is that the
> right place?

If you mean the bit about its mutability marking, I wouldn't bother
listing that in the release notes at all.  It's just a pro-forma change,
because the planner doesn't do anything differently with immutable SRFs.

			regards, tom lane