Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 23:03:57 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Using '>' in docs
Message-ID: <20150806030357.GF13687@momjian.us>
References: <20150612022852.GA26788@momjian.us>
 <32553.1434077485@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20150612025351.GA11559@momjian.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150612025351.GA11559@momjian.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:53:51PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:51:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs.  Shouldn't the '>' be escaped,
> > > e.g. =&gt;?
> > 
> > In principle, yes, though you can often get away with this as long as
> > there's not a '<' nearby ...
> 
> Yeah, that's what I thought --- it seems sloppy.  What I am not clear
> about is how to find other cases.

Done.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs