Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axg5t-0005eV-4X for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 19:34:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axg5s-0001CE-FP for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 19:34:52 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axg5r-0001BZ-Kc for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 19:34:51 +0000 Received: from out.smtp-auth.no-ip.com ([8.23.224.60]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axg5m-0006nk-Uj for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 19:34:51 +0000 X-No-IP: alvh.no-ip.org@noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse@no-ip.com Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [216.155.90.98]) (Authenticated sender: alvh.no-ip.org@noip-smtp) by smtp-auth.no-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 79B16400B69; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 063A6438; Tue, 3 May 2016 16:34:42 -0300 (CLST) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:34:42 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Purtz Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Docbook 5.x Message-ID: <20160503193441.GA61759@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <57179283.6080704@purtz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Jürgen Purtz wrote: > Hi, > actually we use DocBook V4.2 for the PostgreSQL manuals. I suggest an > upgrade to DocBook 5.x. This sounds simple, but it will be a long process > with many sub-tasks. Yes, agreed. The killer objection placed last time was that it took something like 10x longer to generate the HTML using the XML-based toolchain than the SGML-based ones. If this is not fixed, let's forget about this whole thing until it is. So, would you time the process using both toolchains and report back? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs