Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 20:45:04 -0700
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, rightfold@gmail.com,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: gen_random_uuid security not explicit in documentation
Message-ID: <20170630034504.GB2045345@rfd.leadboat.com>
References: <20170101232054.10135.50528@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
 <CAB7nPqQuvGF=fqmSUnDZ6-qmCR_w0GygcaztFfDxVg05wk0k8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <22b132fc-e7cb-f40b-aa8e-7a54da41bf96@iki.fi>
 <CAB7nPqTm1SaSwaQS87Xx8Y2Zx9ZthRqwCVWtw76FVd2LqaSy7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170626042628.GA1995569@rfd.leadboat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170626042628.GA1995569@rfd.leadboat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:26:28PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:23:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> > > I'm inclined to change gen_random_uuid() to throw an error if the server is
> > > built with --disable-strong-random, like gen_random_bytes() does. That way,
> > > they would behave the same.
> > 
> > No objections to do that. I guess you don't need a patch. As this is
> > new to 10, I have added an open item.
> 
> [Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]
> 
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Heikki,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.
> 
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs