Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWCb-0004nA-Bz for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 17:54:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWCa-00005w-V5 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 17:54:44 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWCa-00005l-Mm for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 17:54:44 +0000 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([2001:470:e38f::11]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWCV-0004Er-MX for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 17:54:43 +0000 Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B6B2F5F79C; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:54:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:54:38 -0500 From: Stephen Frost To: "Moser, Glen G" Cc: "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Is this still accurate? Message-ID: <20180105175438.GO2416@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <4fe11dc1b660433594624b280b8ad832@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> <3d7cd4673a80438798ad20b83411e3ca@SC58MEXGP001.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> <1646547df04f4555a548ad7815208d5f@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9faJzSu0rU4kggus" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1646547df04f4555a548ad7815208d5f@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --9faJzSu0rU4kggus Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, * Moser, Glen G (Glen.Moser@charter.com) wrote: > Can someone confirm the accuracy of the information found at https://www.= postgresql.org/about/? >=20 > Specifically the maximum data values in the screen shot below...it seems = as though this documentation might be out of date. The part you highlighted was: "There are active PostgreSQL systems in production environments that manage in excess of 4 terabytes of data." Which is pretty accurate, I know of some myself that are larger than 4TB. That 4TB number isn't a limit of any kind and the sentence says "in excess of" meaning that there are databases larger than that. There's actually some which are quite a bit larger than that, in fact. We could bump the number up there or remove the sentence, but I don't think there's anything inaccurate about the statement. Thanks! Stephen --9faJzSu0rU4kggus Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaT7veAAoJEO1sijiDR2RVV4IQAKwx6F1uN/60WdnEqq9yP8ea ew6I8yEqRMogckFdGh0YsROvzm/O3J7XsJqh8/LpeBapPVv4yVaWtTA9JfUJiuJf MYmURI0LpKO6J1MhuctU0mLcnWTp946fHi+rvItd7sjdMC4Ek31UPuRrOyu6wgbX iWImJhWTImrcp5+jnfephh8ouK+t/UIgpaxuXHgTwBasliIKLad6/tQNp++9KYfO pnZmSNwHjNuLtm/MCdtxYCz1pyC7DWVokEc1O6A7mkg85rl9uCUIhISLsCSzNho4 Lh8ktEnmBK6tA4n/CuZLAwRGnwLBSn0blECYXTxZ32zdM8l9wwQOU+ZeZ2EP/Gr8 tePX5kobAB2RBveK4MXnF+0JKreYPBX6Zyl1Aw3dHcBrUy/703oDN47TKpDNDWPi cr7joc5fZZhjZHMhfCQQf1BvMVBHzrsrcrDrPZvg5cT39IhpqNni4hvMu8Vvx/J9 vC7Qbuy3GpV3zDvx90BcfIiJHPX4i3N6DCoyAjfbcisf9IFTD65VUs4RtDh3UmLl ipRLmXaVeWdIXr4SYc3AloQ7I1F/zOlin4lqn0BYMhQkq79ccUNWT6VUsCl13dAb wgMKJZZtJ3T6yt9b1F1Z4+kWkyxQJU9Fwow9dP0PNKCAwB9NwgnmJqPUc90gcztk emRSmAEfLi8oNlp1kq2L =pX3k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9faJzSu0rU4kggus--