Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWI5-0005Ki-On for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:00:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWI4-0005EU-Qx for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:00:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWI4-0005EJ-Ld for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:00:24 +0000 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([96.255.250.162]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWI1-0007od-Ru for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:00:24 +0000 Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 04CEA5F79C; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 13:00:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 13:00:19 -0500 From: Stephen Frost To: "Moser, Glen G" Cc: "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Is this still accurate? Message-ID: <20180105180019.GP2416@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <4fe11dc1b660433594624b280b8ad832@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> <3d7cd4673a80438798ad20b83411e3ca@SC58MEXGP001.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> <1646547df04f4555a548ad7815208d5f@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> <20180105175438.GO2416@tamriel.snowman.net> <68e5e2554e2240c6a22bd384fa7c9659@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4WBDOB4Uaxoy/HSp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <68e5e2554e2240c6a22bd384fa7c9659@SC58MEXGP036.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --4WBDOB4Uaxoy/HSp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, * Moser, Glen G (Glen.Moser@charter.com) wrote: > That's really the gist of the concern from a team member of mine. Not th= at the 4TB number is wrong but that it could be misleading to assume that 4= TB is some sort of upper bound. >=20 > That's how this concern was relayed to me and I am just following up. Well, saying 'in excess of' is pretty clear, but I don't think the sentence is really adding much either, so perhaps we should just remove it. Thanks! Stephen --4WBDOB4Uaxoy/HSp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaT70zAAoJEO1sijiDR2RVxwEP/RA6t0YBGcXJ1Zb0sKRCh+er wXXaVEIYze0vJPJx4IO/Sbwzkz8Rroh2bajUbqgaAjz5CmzzoO400zLeIS6YbC+Z JBbCRW1SZs3FJJbwRUdKGtJXJ2Zai9d2E80QNbwRnXTMfFLBc/pbgN2K93tu79GH gV+n45znR/wiQhgKcHQAS6guAfG5Hqvmeu7Y3fggsHDI01A91M14C9ZVSU2a4x1F aoKDAhZdW7y6QBmICyEig1vxQjx1YcwP5FoXWopQXN2bY+ls4ME75zTfjhE0YC2W FQbyIanlgtS4CX0zwXZzMUSxoNL9ShjxCM2KY6Sg2s3Ixrpr/Xr9lFbrSv3iBbaZ m/A0JiMNkVezFJzJM4UQlZ6/xxzmcFcxyT4GQmfB8WC4QbBWvn8KCHoAV1cH+iAx B1WQufhJsc2LoDJhTLkKMWdD84+DCeyV1lekZi3GG2cwVfGiFARcqHu2Wo4agg4s H1NvL2O2Q/ud4lL/nyaGlSVrsXHeAA1roynDRxtpfr6zdJjCc0sfK/QT/+fQ7RF2 66q3p22mbgd5UyIBOD4pzXYB1Y3eB61mOg4SCY6i88OAyFeDJfB2RvRpqwftAHKy KKZSRJNz2i/yYHOXPkOG5QW7qLM3Sh0j6PcU6s6oGo6UqCFoHGHWD9AuVnfzWOzP Mqi3f/REWQ7lzlV4Oq8I =KnYm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4WBDOB4Uaxoy/HSp--