Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:39:55 -0500
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>,
	Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
	David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Subject: Re: Correction of intermediate certificate handling
Message-ID: <20180117133955.GC26285@momjian.us>
References: <20180116002238.GC12724@momjian.us>
 <20180116053305.GB2212@paquier.xyz>
 <20180116162122.GB1470@momjian.us>
 <20180117000950.GB935@paquier.xyz>
 <20180117032344.GA26285@momjian.us>
 <20180117082000.GA13673@paquier.xyz>
 <20180117123442.GB26285@momjian.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180117123442.GB26285@momjian.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 07:34:42AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The succession of commands of commands for the intermediate certificates
> > is wild. Could it be possible to explain what each command means? Users
> > would not get lost this way.
> 
> Yes, I was not happy about that either.  I was afraid that pound-sign
> comments would look like root prompts but I just added them and they
> look fine.  Updated patch attached, with some expiration and wording
> adjustments.  There is also a new paragraph at the end explaining where
> to place the files.

Oh, and how far back should these be backpatched?  10?  9.6?  9.3? I am
thinking it should be done as far back as possible as long as it is
simple.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +