Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 21:27:07 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal
Message-ID: <20180809012707.GA9533@momjian.us>
References: <19252.1533509841@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAKt_ZfsDqo-yjYZbGFvuCfm7DPeqCyDFP5vvam125PzpzVr6yw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKt_ZfsDqo-yjYZbGFvuCfm7DPeqCyDFP5vvam125PzpzVr6yw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug  8, 2018 at 09:53:42PM +0700, Chris Travers wrote:
>     It seems to me that this would still provide enough historical
>     info for just about any ordinary interest.  We could discuss ways
>     of making a complete release-note archive available somewhere,
>     if "go dig in the git repo" doesn't seem like an adequate answer
>     for that.
> 
> Works for me.  Especially with a release note archive available somewhere.

Works for me, though, is there no interest in keeping the SGML files in
the git tree and just not building them as docs?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +