Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gCRQQ-0007Vs-A1 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:38:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gCRQO-0006ra-UY for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:38:24 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gCRQO-0006rT-LA for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:38:24 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gCRQL-0006GP-Ub for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:38:23 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gCRQK-0005lw-O8; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:38:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:38:20 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: nat@makarevitch.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: effective_cache_size Message-ID: <20181016153820.GD31154@momjian.us> References: <153685164808.22334.15432535018443165207@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <20181011174849.GC7807@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181011174849.GC7807@momjian.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 01:48:49PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > So, I think there are two action items here. First, rename "disk" to > "drive" or "storage" in the docs and server variable descriptions. > Second, unify the description of effective_cache_size to talk about > storage cache size, not just kernel storage cache, and maybe even talk > about the double buffering effect. I have attached a patch for the second item, which I would like to backpatch. I don't think I want to deal with all the "disk" mentions at this time. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="effective.diff" diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml index 7554cba..b8e32d7 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml @@ -4147,7 +4147,8 @@ ANY num_sync (