Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gIZEO-00025C-Fm for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 13:11:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gIZEM-0001zt-0l for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 13:11:18 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gIZEL-0001zi-Qq for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 13:11:17 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gIZEJ-0008W9-Db for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 13:11:17 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIZEH-00067f-JD; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 09:11:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:11:13 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: nat@makarevitch.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: effective_cache_size Message-ID: <20181102131113.GD4015@momjian.us> References: <153685164808.22334.15432535018443165207@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <20181011174849.GC7807@momjian.us> <20181016153820.GD31154@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181016153820.GD31154@momjian.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:38:20AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 01:48:49PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > So, I think there are two action items here. First, rename "disk" to > > "drive" or "storage" in the docs and server variable descriptions. > > Second, unify the description of effective_cache_size to talk about > > storage cache size, not just kernel storage cache, and maybe even talk > > about the double buffering effect. > > I have attached a patch for the second item, which I would like to > backpatch. I don't think I want to deal with all the "disk" mentions at > this time. Patch applied through 9.3. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +