Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gU0JJ-0000UD-FR for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:19:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gU0JG-00062n-Sg for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:19:38 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gU0JG-00062g-8w for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:19:38 +0000 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gU0JC-0003r8-7U for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:19:37 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B6713C5; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 21:19:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Dec 2018 21:19:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=f3gaQm8l/+7fml7bEoGNOM4NCtp P2Df4VS693zQ3IbQ=; b=f4xmsUEXvCBiDrrKhKdPiE4QypgsuUF8n92/u8wZ6BU 6kbFPHSAQai1k82yu3BnB/hib6qziv70ZxEChDjdnjN1NbAPgUWxo+qlVf8Mjz/R t0mrLG6x5Wqbjlwj0++cXu23/PtXxCjg8h0IkwIn6QAnZXJ9igN8FWFw8f+70j8n ipdnrem/KjL5UG7DkcuczCs98Vu08WJpZhYCgHB1LAcYzK9TuVXBuKjCAGH0QYuV +uSIQPxUimXjizkQRSlGTLpXaZS9S9H6vlSMyO5+4NXSZhjBsys2hff+MVRzIl0M l23RfhPiTc+TRQ9qQgSC2qiKvNWxLb7JnmnE/Ln743w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=f3gaQm 8l/+7fml7bEoGNOM4NCtpP2Df4VS693zQ3IbQ=; b=gpV/yOpraRBh7HLuh7/sdN gt44N+gncMoYNfUKtekVl5ErV8ho4NhCmnHFrKu5IYH/za1kJ5J3AicArVwU5LaN y8ZLsGh9UrCdfIjYI9ztn/VPtVW6Wl57vnFG9QJkanNAX59L0j+6AEV8fPyjWh4P W9niunaBJEWuji1qyixUyEvqP+zwnJF9owdhJA+dD81IbhLsn47AM15R1CBeJyU4 iHYpyMW8wFvHi7ibE2iPrbGuL1QQR4xn/vjyfqsTUTjKJXCN/05KStKepwnJe70o 3Fo3fVAS6vKCqVgR0IAryeFMftSVd9SSvFa3W1QmEfAQT12P0u0cJrCBseT6p0mQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (c137162.net61215.cablenet.ne.jp [61.215.137.162]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 89E8CE44A5; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 21:19:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:19:25 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Thomas Munro Cc: milyutinma@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Typo in description of replay_lag attribute in pg_stat_replication view Message-ID: <20181204021925.GM3423@paquier.xyz> References: <27b3b80c-3615-2d76-02c5-44566b53136c@gmail.com> <20181204001802.GK3423@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p1Od3smaOkJqivj4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --p1Od3smaOkJqivj4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:28:15PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM Michael Paquier wrot= e: >> Yes, you are right. It should be "on" as "remote_flush" is not a valid >> value. remote_flush is listed in SyncCommitLevel though, so this makes >> me wonder if we should also introduce a new value for this purpose >> available for users. The fix you propose looks good to me. Any >> opinions from others? >=20 > +1 for the patch. Thanks for confirming, Thomas. I'll go apply hopefully tomorrow if nobody has objections. > As for introducing remote_flush as the true name of the level, this > was discussed but somehow went off-course and never made it to the > finish line: >=20 > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEepm%3D3FFaanSS4sugG%2BApzq2= tCVjEYCO2wOQBod2d7GWb%3DDvA%40mail.gmail.com Oh, I forgot this one. We may want to revive that... remote_flush is more meaningful than on, especially since there are more and more possible values for synchronous_commit. -- Michael --p1Od3smaOkJqivj4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAlwF5C0ACgkQnvQgOdby QH2OpA//chfGsUB9axAdEBnQg07yWIybiFrqtA556cLWFwmMMRaLapqPk29oG9nz T+lwyzrltbnp1D5dpc/+GcbB0OJRjuOjFWAkdQaBB6PTTJjZLb753CC1x3VB5eb3 i/a1G970gXl34Zelx6jzgb65UQXR1ugxLvlGOeqlHkuhVQazcnbUT6Ki3goOeQ77 9QPAhAE8rkEfzm8Y6okameVXVOqwQYr1gKAgvyc9lPRaas5P2U5Ms9NFfSE/sQtj 7BbrfuVCNcJbb5/XdOqe6adS8DXSjFmOqziHflCogSmy+IMdI0PVoXDJv8JnYENy Lac6SH9dh583nwWDTOPPz4yDGnpkGHfevdsh/4oqZzNwajSkpmOpa3sq7xjvI/kD t197KrQ9YXj/KVhT6UEn852qZIKQOkaHKC2dhZR7j92Z6ZheD2BkVDxELtJnGRPn tnl3aes/avzODjY9dpUefBGZWp2Il7lqEFwKwWICFowsISK2zsEYXbiuckybyZnl HzEGkIpKs9igcdx1ONgPwormXnqFHVgUWDQvixTdoHb+Kj/t5ixvXuw+l9P+KYvz EgriLhrRebrc4OwnH8Oeh5w8QMyrrICeTf+KDi1osU6Vqd1EUVwz7VZTUB9W966R hjKBi419tMCZ1zy5VGLCizImjzVn0q4i/fXZoPm1no/0+xlHkWQ= =c9u8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p1Od3smaOkJqivj4--