Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gfP89-0006cK-Ch for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:03:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gfP87-0005Le-Sp for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:03:15 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gfP87-0005LX-Mm for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:03:15 +0000 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gfP83-0003pW-Et for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:03:15 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA47145A; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 08:03:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Jan 2019 08:03:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=WYZPzlONYnXGfJkR6VYKng7T4RI 0sOKVgjr0yYtG5vc=; b=R1jgHNavOFPHZWBd0OzqBOhGH3+xO0pF/cY5uJ7tgpD P4biLio52zJTbiiUkkdqioOBRVYYGWR6G7j4DbtUOjhyWw5HzXQ2x7AD1w2dGrk2 cUQlQv5om/VIiuXnNNZPSsO875O2iKfjmBH5gsBQfUk6Bih84tDrpNqPWWzQTUEI XcmC/NCjIoEKyo9T8hgzklCpP34osSzxeUciFZNLHgPku7lKO8lBLUPfFjLP3zUg OKp71OtCzVvExzN+9b+vbS3StArv0fkR6iI8LUkRRjd5DTKbe4QQxBmvUGB6HAT/ 1ed89Gz6pD9bohwcpeeft3lY8yg+D7TQ8ul5AJ9nrig== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=WYZPzl ONYnXGfJkR6VYKng7T4RI0sOKVgjr0yYtG5vc=; b=I+kFSCNpYzZuAxwKF3SSp0 uoFzaTAM31a4LTyQaAtAtpkImIBgjvL7mtpCSOkc+yZxh23YWJ/Q9dopSwN681ad EkWpuGaZgJrDqMeTMskg64gjcqUspjUTG7WEokbNzZRDGe4sH19sFuLVt1n3b+JG NiopIPheRUnP3Au8jdXrgxixo89cfU8DBTKWqkPInZFbklkRiUmAVk2NZGOanMm/ 0didxjRBzz9oevQeNaX4WHJvqndXzVaSAMrES3VIB5cAVvElOH1kKGtK+jHXL/0z 660D/GPNuBvJ498cspuioE3av0p22mWD8X2HE7Z4JdDhlBRqRKbNzc15L2HyKRGQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrvddugdegkeculddtuddrgedtkedrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgfrhhlucfvnfffucdlfeehmdenucfjughrpeffhf fvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhu ihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucffohhmrghinhepih gvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppeeiuddrvdduhedrudefjedrudeivdenucfrrghrrghmpehm rghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiienucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (c137162.net61215.cablenet.ne.jp [61.215.137.162]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 38C6CE4147; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 08:03:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 22:03:03 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Tom Lane Cc: elisabeth314@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Broken link in JSON Types documentation Message-ID: <20190104130303.GE2067@paquier.xyz> References: <154645929104.5292.17420414597290599745@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <12837.1546470715@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12837.1546470715@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:11:55PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > In PG v10 and up this link goes to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159. > Evidently whoever updated it didn't bother to back-patch into old > branches. I don't think that really cool to have user-facing documentation which goes to the void on supported branches, especially if there is an adequate replacement. Tom, do you think that this is worth updating? -- Michael --J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAlwvWYcACgkQnvQgOdby QH06Ng//Yg4iGnWivb5yf6yZEe7eq4kWj/Mxj1f6/7OJZ3mkbE+Jy+kc81LZJBTw ueDuc5GJG+ER1F8hNEx0qcliKyxvIfNWw7/UfFMdrsYOdD4ZzK+3QVnxxdauZ+Ry ooiwVyT+3IE4d2t4Bfduk9xU5IJqQSolSKGVY2n4c3tMxtYTjjZ5oL1/QJTm0aWb lGVbPWPjNGwaE8k6sn7WSnwX/9zAYtovIXkYtIzoshA+qfxR/9DkS5CGUdJuv+01 bGUF3jGciooow3bO67UFAIyVN8C+i31ww2VMta1Y84VaG2SUZSg8B1vR7N5I+PnX HOWF9ngCY3cLDJo9Lc28nUXJq6rGPSRGI5FOcI8zjqdDnQYqaAAuMU5mNXCnfhKv IITbKDuk32QeUA7/wTDpB4G/MmQs5TJRTbkBzTBqjDwLcJ7jk4prujm0ywrlnGAw ZCqqmODO42+4SueNVWrw8LkX7S1q7OwEhuRfokvmikWtmE/17PJdlH0hiJ+hlZRY qHHwSYqEKgJRA0SgG1QFs0wt7TOe1bhAeB+w4sGJZ0eUAcVpSY3PFzHuyH0UzS+u hqQCV2Mhy9JJvY2J1uOXAi65wxUn3jxIxOkS3CEbs2HbA9bA9qiC60dQvwnGyaz5 PMqH0fx1GJAWRarG6CgiRtkaP8ArffO0ac9yqB7VxWg+MG6ZWLs= =UFmv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr--