Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:54:11 -0500
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: First SVG graphic
Message-ID: <20190309155411.mn5hqlhjbhhrdb4u@momjian.us>
References: <6a97acaf-06e8-519c-a4ff-04a13e0d2675@2ndquadrant.com>
 <5ad6b96d-47d0-eb08-edc4-803645d2fd31@purtz.de>
 <4393cdcd-4efd-3198-4ffc-c080a5af79c7@2ndquadrant.com>
 <e5e6fa66-80b5-1225-8d22-07897435d0e2@purtz.de>
 <55a6a8cb-bfaa-e5a6-4596-82f445f1ec7c@2ndquadrant.com>
 <86af349c-5bcb-a28c-d858-c5cb0a283cd2@purtz.de>
 <cdb0e8e1-5c02-0dfe-c829-acfab314b1fc@2ndquadrant.com>
 <808a932e-bc40-d57e-7de2-5e4fd9a24ac6@purtz.de>
 <f6145ddb-0690-d493-8c30-fbe7aa892425@2ndquadrant.com>
 <58af275f-a46a-0ec5-8f95-c8ece23ee038@purtz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <58af275f-a46a-0ec5-8f95-c8ece23ee038@purtz.de>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Mar  9, 2019 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> As an example of such differences I append two files: gin.svg ("Optimized
> SVG" plus my manually optimizations; the originally uploaded file) and
> gin_pure_opt.svg (pure "Optimized SVG").
> 
> What is your opinion? Should we renounce the additional manual step and use
> only the pure "Optimized SVG" format? This will increase the
> 'diff-ablility', which may be valuable in the long term. But direct
> readability of the files suffers more or less.

Uh, so really there is plain SVG, "Optimized SVG", and readable SVG.  I
am thinking you should store just "Optimized SVG", and provide a shell
script to convert to readable SVG for those that want it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +