Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fwQ-0004Gv-Cv for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:39:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fwM-0002AW-Mg for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:39:18 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fwM-0002AO-Gd for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:39:18 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fwF-0004Ko-GN for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:39:17 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2fwB-0007lC-WA; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:39:07 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 12:39:07 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Tom Lane Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Purtz , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: First SVG graphic Message-ID: <20190309173907.a6r6ghkokhbh4x3p@momjian.us> References: <4393cdcd-4efd-3198-4ffc-c080a5af79c7@2ndquadrant.com> <55a6a8cb-bfaa-e5a6-4596-82f445f1ec7c@2ndquadrant.com> <86af349c-5bcb-a28c-d858-c5cb0a283cd2@purtz.de> <808a932e-bc40-d57e-7de2-5e4fd9a24ac6@purtz.de> <58af275f-a46a-0ec5-8f95-c8ece23ee038@purtz.de> <20190309155411.mn5hqlhjbhhrdb4u@momjian.us> <21705.1552150171@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <21705.1552150171@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:49:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Jürgen Purtz wrote: > >> What is your opinion? Should we renounce the additional manual step and use > >> only the pure "Optimized SVG" format? This will increase the > >> 'diff-ablility', which may be valuable in the long term. But direct > >> readability of the files suffers more or less. > > > Uh, so really there is plain SVG, "Optimized SVG", and readable SVG. I > > am thinking you should store just "Optimized SVG", and provide a shell > > script to convert to readable SVG for those that want it. > > Man, this discussion is leaving me disheartened. It sure sounds like > we are going to end up in a situation where either everyone touching > the graphics has to use the same version of the same tool (with the > same options, even), or else we're going to have massive, unreadable, > and mostly content-free diffs in every patch. Yes, that might end up being the case. I think the only saving part is that we aren't going to have lots of people editing the graphics. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +